Bravobo

Sunday, April 30, 2006

Dennis ophenheim

When the work becomes autobiographical it permitted this delivery of questions toward a self. The engaging of these questions in the work became the substance of the work. It was a much closer aptitude than making sculpture. They were usually stimulated skeletal views into the frailty of decision making. These works admitted things, showed procedures, uncovered secrets-things we usually keep camouflaged. So there was a supposition that nothing is as important as knowing why we do what we're doing. What precipitated the autobiographical performance body-related pieces was the feeling that it is a trap, a superficial preoccupation in comparison to work which interrogates itself.

Friday, April 28, 2006

stripping things down, wanting to find alternatives to the logic surrounding object making.
moving out of the studio and looking rather than making objects
One replaced making with thinking.
It was muting manual production and opting for an art of mental activation
Physicality in artwork
One was tempted to carry work away from the art context into real time stuctures.
So there was a tremendous thrust to radicalize the whole concept of what artist do. It was a dangerous thing to control.
Going too far with it you completely burnt out your bearings as an aritst, and you open up these tremendous demands for learning other disciplines, the need for information was incredible.

activation:explains plugging in, affecting, overlapping, an on-going real time system.
body work is more close to the material, becoming the material, becoming the object.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006


Luba Lukasa

Without flowing wine
How to enjoy lovely
Cherry blossoms?

Tibetan Buddhist monks: mandala sand-paintings

Culture in Action show in Chicago 1993: art in the city streets

Earlier art movements:
-Situationism International
-Arts and Crafts Movement: John Ruskin and William Morris; Morris: "Apart from my desire to produce beautiful things, the leading passion of my life is hatred of modern civilisation." "Have nothing in your houses which you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful."
from John Burdick's book on Morris: "Morris was driven like few others to create, and all of his creations shared a common purpose: to oppose what he saw as the bland tedium, greed, and degraded tastes of the Victorian industrial world and to restore the power of art in everyday life."

John Dewey's View: art for the living organism in its environment

AGAINST GRAVITROPISM: ART AND THE JOYS OF LEVITATION

Eduardo Kac

"Gravitropism" means growth in response to gravity [1]. I use the term gravitropism in art beyond its biological origin, to underscore the fact that gravity plays a fundamental role in the forms and events we are able to create on Earth, and that forms and events created in zero gravity to be experienced in the same environment might be radically different. I first wrote about gravitropic forms and events in 1987, while creating and articulating the theory of a new poetic language produced out of light, with protean linguistic events floating and changing in space, freed from material and gravitational constraints. In my original text I stated: "As we experience massless optical volumes -- focused luminous vibrations suspended in the air -- "gravitropism" (form conditioned by gravity) makes way for "antigravitropism" (creation of new forms not conditioned by gravity), freeing the mind from the clichés of the physical world and challenging the imagination". [2] I coined the word "antigravitropism" to retain the affirmative quality of negating or neutralizing gravity.

The powerful gesture of defying gravity in art can be traced back to innovative early twentieth-century sculptors, such as Calder and Moholy-Nagy. While the first reduced the support of massive structures to a single suspended point with his "Mobiles", the second went as far as experimenting directly with levitation, with absolutely no physical support whatsoever. In his seminal book "Vision in Motion", published posthumously in 1947, Moholy-Nagy appears levitating a chisel with compressed air. The photograph is striking: we see Moholy-Nagy's profile and before him the object suspended in the air with no apparent means of support. In previous books Moholy-Nagy articulated notions about the evolution of sculptural form, suggesting that the virtual volume--volume created optically by the accelerated motion of an object--was a new possibility for sculpture. In his film "Design Workshops" (1946), he presented a sequence, less than a minute long, in which colored ping pong balls float in an air jet. As an artist crossing many discipline boundaries, Moholy-Nagy also considered that in the future the neutralization of gravity could be a useful tool in design. It was not until the 1960s that several of this visionary's ideas would find currency. Hans Haacke's sculpture "Sphere in Oblique Air-Jet" (1967), presents the viewer with precisely what its title indicates: a buoyant balloon that stably hovers in space. The sculpture accomplishes this feat through what is known as Bernoulli's principle, according to which a stream of air (or fluid) has lower pressure than stationary air (or fluid). On a practical level, this means that moving air can create aerodynamic lift.



Moholy-Nagy levitating a chisel, as reproduced in "Vision in Motion", 1947.
Courtesy Hattula Moholy-Nagy
Hans Haacke, "Sphere in Oblique Air-Jet", 1967.

Although the Hungarian constructivist did not explore this notion in his own sculptures, levitation and the conquest of space attracted the attention of artists working in the 1950s. Lucio Fontana's Spatialist movement, for example, made direct references to space. In 1951 he clearly stated: "Man's real conquest of space is his detachment from the earth". Aaron Siskind's 1950s series of photographs "Terrors and Pleasures of Levitation" present the viewer with contorted and airborne human bodies. These compelling images, which evoke humankind's mythical dream of flying, look as though they could be right out of an astronaut training program. While in both cases it is really the metaphor of space and levitation that is brought to the fore, the use of magnetism to suspend forms in space became the key element in the innovative work of the Greek kinetic artist Takis. In 1938 Gyorgy Kepes produced a series of photographs and photograms in which he experimented with the visual properties of magnets and iron filings, but it was Takis who, in 1959, introduced the aesthetic of sculptural magnetic levitation with his elegant "Télésculpture". The sculpture is composed of three small conical metal pieces that are attached, through thin wires, to three nails. The three conical pieces are suspended above an irregular plane and levitate in front of a magnet. This was the seed of a complex body of work through which this magician of levitation has investigated the expressive power of invisible forces. In September of 1959, the Moon was first visited by the Soviet spacecraft Lunik 2. As the first probe to impact the Moon, Lunik 2 made evident that human displacement in space was on the horizon. Fascinated by the implications of this idea, Takis realized an event in 1960 at the Iris Clert Gallery, in Paris, entitled "L'Impossible, Un Homme Dans L'Espace" (The Impossible, A Man in Space). Donning a "Space Suit" designed by Takis, wearing a helmet, and attached to a metal rod connected to the floor, Sinclair Belles was "launched" across the gallery onto a safety net. The event orchestrated by Takis pointed to the unknown: the logic and the biologic that govern human existence on Earth will not readily apply to our life in space. Also responding to the visual and intellectual stimulation provided by humankind's first steps beyond the Earth, Yves Klein's "Leap into the Void" (1960) was a photomontage alluding to the new condition of the body considered, rather concretely, in relation to the cosmos (reminiscent as it was of Siskind's series). It is worth noting that other artists active in the 1960s further elaborated the vocabulary of magnetism. Harvard-educated Venezuelan sculptor Alberto Collie created electromagnetic levitators for innovative sculptures called spatial absolutes. In his sculptures he employed titanium disks that float freely (that is, with no point of attachment) in an electromagnetic field. If the disk budges, a feedback system strengthens the field, thus keeping the disk in its state of equilibrium.



Yves Klein, "Leap into The Void" (1960), Silver gelatin print, 350 x 270mm.
Aaron Siskind, "Terrors and Pleasures of Levitation, No. 37" (1953), gelatin silver print, 25.1 x 24.1 cm., collection George Eastman House.



One peculiar approach to the suspension of (ephemeral) forms in space is the use of vaporous substances through a technique known as Skywriting, which consists in the writing or drawing formed in the sky by smoke or another gaseous element released from an airplane, usually at approximately 10,000 feet. In the late 1960s and early seventies, artists such as James Turrel, Sam Francis, and Marinus Boezem started to employ skywriting as a medium. Poet David Antin created skypoems over Los Angeles and San Diego in1987-1988. These and other artists and writers created evanescent forms within what is known as troposphere, that is, the lowest atmospheric layer. Pushing the concept of a sky art into the space age, beyond aerial acrobatics and the design of evanescent forms, the Brazilian artist Paulo Bruscky proposed, in 1974, the creation of an artificial aurora borealis, which according to the artist would be produced by airplanes coloring cloud formations. Bruscky published ads in newspapers to both document the project and inform the public. The ads were also an instrument in his search for sponsors. They were published in the Brazilian papers Diário de Pernambuco, in Recife, September 22, 1974 and Jornal do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, December 29, 1976. While on a Guggenheim fellowship in New York, he also published ads in the Village Voice, New York, May 25, 1982. The creation of artificial auroras was realized in 1992, not by Bruscky, but by NASA as part of environmental research. Approximately sixty artificial mini-auroras were created by employing electron guns to fire rays at the atmosphere from the space shuttle Atlantis.



David Antin, "Skypoems", 1987-1988
Vik Muniz's contribution to "En el Cielo", 2001

The artistic use of skywriting further extended the aerial performances set forth in Futurist manifestoes. In addition to the well-known writings of Futurism's founder, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, of particular relevance is the 1919 manifesto "Futurist Aerial Theatre", by Fedele Azari, in which he wrote: "I HAVE MYSELF PERFORMED, IN 1918, MANY EXPRESSIVE FLIGHTS AND EXAMPLES OF ELEMENTARY AERIAL THEATRE OVER THE CAMP OF BUSTO ARSIZIO. I perceived that it was easy for the spectators to follow all the nuances of the aviator's states of mind, given the absolute identification between the pilot and his airplane, which becomes like an extension of his body: his bones, tendons, muscles, and nerves extend into longerons and metallic wires." Another significant, albeit little known antecedent, is the "Dimensionist Manifesto", published in 1936 by the Hungarian poet Károly (aka Charles) Sirato and signed by Arp, Delaunay, Duchamp, Kandinsky, Moholy-Nagy, and Picabia, among others. The "Dimensionist Manifesto" was published in Paris as a loose sheet attached to the magazine Revue N + 1. Its most ambitious proposal is four-dimensional sculpture: "Ensuite doit venir la creation d'un art absolument nouveau: l'art cosmique (Vaporisation de Ia sculpture, theatre Syno-Sens - denominations provisoires). La conquête totale de l'art de l'espace à quatre dimensions (un "Vacuum Artis" jusqu'ici). La matière rigide est abolie et remplacée par des matériaux gazéfiés. L'homme au lieu de regarder les objets d'art, devient lui-même le centre et le sujet de la création, et la création consiste en des effets sensoriels dirigés dans un espace cosmique fermé." This anticipatory vision would become a reality not only through the use of vapors and gases as new art materials (Pierre Huyghe's "L'Expédition Scintillante, Act II: Untitled (light show)", 2002, comes to mind), but through the continuous use of skywriting as a medium in contemporary art, as exemplified by "En el Cielo", an exhibition of skywriting projects created by several artists for the Venice Biennial in 2001 and organized by TRANS>, a New York organization that presents experimental art. In spite of its appeal to artists, though, skywriting is itself a vanishing art form, having been largely replaced in the commercial world by a faster skymessaging technique, known as "skytyping", in which several planes fly in formation and use a computer-controlled radio signal to emit puffs of smoke that form letters.

Bruscky's proposal explored a scale greater than the Land Art or the Earthworks typical of the period, since his vision of an artificial aurora borealis would reach millions at once, who would see the work simply by looking up at the sky. By contrast, works that manipulate magnetism or electromagnetism often have a smaller, more intimate scale. If Takis' work has a forceful and raw power that emanates from his unadorned handling of materials such as iron and steel, quite different are the levitation projects by the American artist Thomas Shannon. Shannon has been creating since the early 1980s a series of sculptures based on materials such as bronze, gold, and marble, as well as painted wood, in which the source of magnetism is not visible. Rather than seeking to make evident the tension that results when opposite poles attract, Shannon's sculptures search for a sense of quiet equilibrium, resting on the visual harmony created by the presence of two basic components: the base and the floating element. Finding in science and natural phenomena a rich source for visual research, Shannon's vocabulary takes levitation into the realm of a reduced articulation of sculptural forms where pairing of objects structures the magnetic experience.

Many developments in twentieth-century art led to a radical reduction in the use of physical matter to form sculptural volume and to support or present this volume in space. From Gabo's constructions (1919/20) to Fontana's perforations, from Moholy-Nagy kinetic works to Calder's mobiles, we have witnessed a movement to liberate modern sculpture from the constraints of enclosed and static form resting on the two-dimensional surface of the pedestal. Artists such as Takis and Shannon -- and the Brazilian sculptor Mario Ramiro, who in 1986 created a self-regulating electromagnetic levitator entitled G0 (standing for "zero gravity") -- have given continuation to this search to release sculpture from gravitropism. In Ramiro's "Gravidade Zero" (Zero Gravity), an electromagnet regulated by a photo-sensor maintains a metallic form floating in space in a state of levitation. Freed from a two-dimensional base, and from any point of support in space, this object is in a truly three-dimensional kinetic space. Ramiro's levitating form presents volume-inversion relations: The area of the object's greater mass can be seen at the top. The lower part, the traditional base of the object, does not need to support the volume above it.




"Past, Present, Future", 1986, sculpture by Tom Shannon
Mario Ramiro, detail of Gravidade Zero (Zero Gravity), wood, brass, glass, electromagnet, electronic components, 81 x 81 x 81 cm, 1986.


The inevitable conclusion is that zero gravity is the next frontier. Artworks have been taken aboard spacecrafts since 1969, when "The Moon Museum", a small ceramic tile with drawings by artists such as Robert Rauschenberg and Andy Warhol, was carried to the Moon aboard a Saturn V rocket on Apollo 12. A significant development was the permanent installation of a sculpture by artist Paul van Hoeydonck (Antwerp, b. 1925) on the surface of the Moon in 1971, also carried on a Saturn V rocket on Apollo 15. Entitled "Fallen Astronaut" (aluminum, 8.5 cm long), the work was placed at the Hadley-Apennine landing site by American astronauts Dave Scott and Jim Irwin (Apollo 15). Next to the sculpture, inserted in the lunar soil is a commemorative plaque, homage to astronauts and cosmonauts who lost their lives in the course of space exploration. In 1989 Lowry Burgess flew objects on the Shuttle as part of a conceptual artwork entitled "Boundless Cubic Lunar Aperture". These works are significant steps towards an art that engages outer space materially, but they were not created in outer space or conceived specifically to investigate the new possibilities of art in true weightlessness. The first works to do so are the sculpture "S.P.A.C.E.", created outside the Earth by American artist Joseph McShane in 1984 and the sculpture "The Cosmic Dancer", created in 1993 by Arthur Woods, an American artist living in Switzerland.



Forrest Myers. "Moon Museum", 1969. Miniaturized and iridium-plated drawings on ceramic wafer. Plate measures 3/4" x 1/2" x 1/40". The drawings are by Myers, Rauschenberg, Oldenburg, Warhol, David Novros, and John Chamberlain.

McShane's work was launched into space on October 5, 1984 aboard the U.S. Space Shuttle Challenger. McShane’s piece was produced with the vacuum of space and the conditions of zero gravity and returned to Earth in its altered state. A sphere with a valve and earth atmosphere within was opened once in orbit. The vacuum of space evacuated the sphere, the valve was closed, and the vacuum of space was then contained within. For McShane, the artwork is not the glass object per se, but the containment of outer space within, the potential wonder generated by bringing space vacuum to Earth and to close proximity to viewers. The question concerning the reception of space art necessarily involves a reflection on the experience of it in space. The primary viewers for "The Cosmic Dancer" lived with the "terrors and pleasures of levitation" in conditions of zero gravity. A sharp-angled form launched to the Mir Space Station on May 22, 1993, "The Cosmic Dancer" stressed the cultural dimension of space since it created the experience of art integrated into a human environment beyond Earth. The video that documents the project shows the two Russian cosmonauts Alexander Polischuk and Gennadi Mannakov performing (rotating, hovering, flying) with the sculpture in the confines of Mir, where the sculpture was left. The flaming remnants of the Mir space station plunged into the South Pacific on March 23, 2002.




The Cosmic Dancer sculpture on the mir space station. Space art project by Arthur Woods launched on may 22, 1993.



In the case of Arthur Woods, the performance of the cosmonauts complements his project. As one watches the video documentation, one feels that the cosmonauts stand vicariously for all viewers, that is, all those who in the future will have the opportunity to experience space as a social and cultural milieu, and not only as a research lab. Clearly, the performance of the body in an environment devoid of the forces of gravity is aesthetically rich in its own right. This very issue has been the focus of French choreographer Kitsou Dubois's work for over a decade. Since 1991 she has been flying in microgravity parabolic flights and exploring the gestural, kinesthetic and proprioceptive potential of weightless dance. She has flown alone as well as with other dancers. Dubois is unique in her relentless investigation of zero gravity. In addition to continuously pursuing new levitation opportunities, she has published extensively on the subject, obtained a Ph.D. with her research as the topic of the dissertation, and recreated her experiences in theatrical as well as installation works. As a byproduct of her choreographic work, Dubois has also developed a training method for astronauts based on her new protocols for zero gravity dance.

The spectrum of the live arts in space would be incomplete without theater. In 1999 Slovenian director Dragan Zivadinov staged his Noordung Zero Gravity Biomechanical Theater high above the Moscow skies, onboard a cosmonaut training aircraft. The flight crew consisted of fourteen people: six actors and an audience of eight. A series of eleven airborne parabolas, with gravity changes oscillating from normal, to twice the usual, to 30-second microgravity episodes, is not the most conducive temporal structure for a long dramatic play. This posed no problem for director Zivadinov, whose vision of an abstract theater is well matched by the experience of weightlessness. Zivadinov placed a red set on the back of the plane and seats for the audience of eight on each wall of the aircraft. Launched from the stage into the empty space before it, actors wearing brightly colored costumes performed in a state of levitation, before being pushed down to the floor by gravity changes, and back up in the air again, and so on, as the airplane completed its parabolas. After eight parabolas, Zivadinov allowed the audience to leave their seats and participate in the euphoric state of bodily suspension, a unique form of audience-actor empathy and, undoubtedly, a new level for the old-age dramaturgical device once described by Aristotle as catharsis.

While Zivadinov conceived of the aircraft as a theatrical set, and Woods employed a space station as an ancillary element in the fulfillment of the antigravitropic potential of his sculpture, the media artist, architect, and designer Doug Michaels proposed in 1987 the design of a rather unique space station cum artwork cum "alternative architecture". A co-founder of Ant Farm design group ('68-'78), Michaels was the co-creator of emblematic works of the period, such as Cadillac Ranch (ten cars planted nose down in 1974 in a wheat field located west of Amarillo, Texas) and Media Burn (a 1975 performance in which Michels drove a Cadillac through a pyramid of television sets on fire). In 1986 he established the Doug Michels Studio to pursue innovative projects in architecture and design. Michaels, who passed away in 2003, developed with his colleagues in 1987 a concept for a spacecraft to host artists and scientists interested in human-dolphins interaction and communication. The project resonated with the pioneering work of John Lilly, a scientist who defended the idea that dolphins have consciousness and intelligence at a time when this fact was not yet scientifically established. As a result of his research, Lilly went on to author books such as "Man and dolphin" (Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday, 1961), "The Mind Of The Dolphin: A Nonhuman Intelligence" (Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday, 1967) and "Communication Between Man and Dolphin: The Possibilities of Talking With Other Species" (New York: Crown Publishers, 1978). On its January-February issue of 1987, the magazine The Futurist featured Michaels's Project Bluestar, an orbiting "think tank in zero gravity" meant to include both humans and dolphins. According to the proposed design, the marine mammals' ultrasonic emissions would be used to program the central computer. This proposal was as much about the vision



Detail
Doug Michels, "Blue Star Human Dolphin Space Colony", 1987. Artwork by Peter Bollinger.

In 1993, the same year Woods launched "The Cosmic Dancer", the Chinese artist Niu Bo started "The Zero-Gravity Project", which he first pursued in Japan with a plane that flies in parabolic arcs at 20,000-25,000 ft. Bo covered the interior of the plane with rice paper and used a paint produced from the mixture of several elements. To create this paint the artist combined China ink, watercolor, and oil, among other materials, and placed the paint in balloons. During the near weightlessness of microgravity flights, he released the paint. With his "Space Atelier" Bo wishes to convey that just as the Impressionists had to leave their studios to explore the possibilities of natural light, a new culture will be created when artists leave the surface of the Earth.



Niu Bo, The Zero-Gravity Project, 1993.


The Spanish artist and performer Marcel.li Antúnez Roca created Dedalus, a series of microperformances realized in 2003 during two parabolic flights aboard the Tupolev plane, flown at the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center, Star City, Russia. This work was part of a larger project carried out by the London organization The Arts Catalyst, which aims to enable artists to work in microgravity conditions. Performing with an exoskeleton wireless interface and the robot Requiem, Roca's involuntary movements activated videos by means of potentiometers in the dresskeleton’s circuit. The videos explore themes that the artist considers evocative of an exobiological iconography, such as biochemistry/microbiology, higher transgenic organisms and bio robots.






Marcel.li Antúnez Roca, Dedalus, 2003

Artworks such as discussed above open a new realm of speculative inquiry into the future of art in worlds other than the Earth. While we remain confined to the blue planet, three possibilities open up for art that engages what could be called a "zero gravity sensibility". First, it is clear that the potential for magnetism and electromagnetism in art is far from exhausted. Second, the increasing access to microgravity facilities in Russia will force the opening of new markets in Europe, Japan, and the United States, further enabling more artists and performers to explore weightlessness. Third, as plans for space tourism evolve, actual zero gravity might also become more accessible, albeit at a lower pace, since costs will remain high for the foreseeable future. Space tourism was jumpstarted on April 28, 2001, when the Russian Soyuz-U booster blasted two Russian cosmonauts and a paying tourist, the American millionaire Dennis A. Tito, into orbit for a rendezvous with the International Space Station.

Electromagnetism holds great potential for sculptural levitation. Yet untapped, for example, is a property known as diamagnetism. Diamagnetic materials repel both the north and south poles of a magnet. All materials are weakly diamagnetic, but it is difficult to levitate ordinary objects. However, with a strong magnetic field and strongly diamagnetic materials (such as neodymium magnets and graphite blocks), it is possible to create stable regions for diamagnetic levitation.

Artists seeking to explore levitation beyond magnetism and electromagnetism can investigate advanced techniques presently only found in research laboratories. A high-temperature electrostatic levitator allows the control of heating and levitation independently and, unlike an electromagnetic levitator, does not require that the floating object be a conductor of electric charge. Acoustic levitators enable the suspension of liquids in a state of equilibrium through acoustic radiation force. Also, liquids can be suspended by a gas jet and stabilized by acoustic forces. Superconductor levitators enable objects to float above a magnet in fog of liquid nitrogen. With a laser levitator it is possible to trap gas bubbles in water and create a condition of stable levitation by applying optical radiation pressure of the light beam horizontally and vertically. Atom chips allow for the trapping and manipulation of clouds of atoms, which magnetically levitate above the chip's surface. Portable quantum labs promise to further expand the magnetic control of atom clouds levitating in free space. At last, as levitation touches biology, molecular magnetism is predicated on the application of ordinary but very strong magnetic forces over a regular object. The forces are directed upwards and take advantage of the very weak magnetic response of the object present in the field, enabling the levitation of objects usually not regarded as capable of levitation (such as plastics) and living organisms (plants, insects, small animals -- and conceivably humans, if the field could be made strong enough). The manipulation of the magnetic properties of nanosized objects is also a possibility, which could include macroscopic manifestation of the quantum behavior of these very small objects. These techniques offer a glimpse into what might be possible when life in the international space station becomes more common, when colonization of the Moon goes from science fiction to science fact, and when the space program overcomes what, in the public opinion, is its most exciting challenge: landing human beings on Mars. The creation of new alloys and compounds in zero gravity and the prospect of interplanetary colonization suggest that space exploration is more than a metaphor in art. It is a material and intellectual challenge that must be met.


NOTES

1 - Gravitropism is a Botany term. Roots have positive gravitropism because they grow in the same direction of gravitational forces (i.e. down). Stems on the other hand have negative gravitropism, as they grow against gravity (i.e. up).


2 - Kac, Eduardo. "Sintaxe, Leitura e Espaço na Holopoesia", catalogue of the exhibition "Arte e Palavra" (Word and Image), Forum de Ciência e Cultura, Universidade Federal, Rio de Janeiro, 1987.


http://www.ekac.org/levitation.html


Hans Haacke, news, 1969 / 2005, at the state of the union show, Paula Cooper Gallery

You may have noticed a little bit of playing by Thando Mama on the blog over the past few days, as he gets to know the Wordpress software — he responded to the artthrob article about how I’ve been looking for peops to participate in this space, and is learning how to upload and spell check now (!). Forgive the inconsistencies. If you are interested in blogging (I NEED writers now!!!!), contact me.

I, on the other hand, have been a little sickly, and running around like a headless chicken. Simon, Bronwyn and I have been catching as many of the Marina Abromovic performances as we can (between us, we’ve missed only two), checking out some amazing work at the MOMA and PS 1, running to the Berni Searle and DJ Spooky show on the LES, gallery hopping in Chelsea, etc and so forth.

Highlights include (no time to look up URLs, but by all means, google it!):

Lips of Thomas re-enactment/document by Marina
Hans Haacke at Paula Cooper
James Turrell at both MOMA and PS 1
Gary Hill (his stuff at MOMA, but not at PS 1)
I had forgotten about the Kentridge permanent stairwell at PS 1!
Jon Kessler at PS 1 was not my taste, but it was a very successful installation
Chatting to another Staten Islander at Berni Searle’s thing (who knew they liked art?)
The New Museum book store
In South Africa? You should be sad if you missed the Colleen Alborough exhibition at KZNSA - shame on you. The eKapa conference in Cape Town is coming up, and looks hot — wish I could make it. Chat to Simon about his trip while there, if you can! Also, tell Franci Cronje hi.

But sooner, and in Joburg, don’t miss Etch A Sketch: “an experience into the unfamiliar edge where art and sound converge. Watch live collaborations between visual artists and musicians for the first time ever in the entire universe.” Wow. That’s awesome.
Drill Hall, Thursday 24 November, 7:30pm, R30, cash bar. Features include Joao Orecchia, mtkidu, Mitch Said and Templar Wales.


Hans Haacke: Grass Grows 1969. Erde, Winterweizen, Roggen, Licht, Wasser. Temporäre
Installation Andrew Dickson White Museum of Art, Ithaca

Aquatic Notes

Objective

Students will explore how the mass of water can affect sound vibrations.

Materials

assorted shapes of plastic cups or glass soda bottles (one shape for each student group)
water
pencils
Background

Sound is a form of energy (a vibration) that travels through the air in waves. Sound vibrations have different frequencies. Scientists measure frequency in vibrations per second, or Hertz (Hz). Our sense of hearing interprets the changes in frequencies as a change in pitch. A low-pitched sound has a low frequency A high-pitched sound has a high frequency You can change the frequency of a vibrating object by changing its structure. A more secure object may vibrate faster than a loose object when struck.

An easy way to change the structure of a cup is to add weight - just fill it with water. As the glass is filled, it becomes more stable and vibrates slower when struck. Sound travels 1,450 meters per second in seawater that has a density of 1.025 grams per cm3 and 334 meters per second through air at 20*C that has a density of 0.001293 grams per cm3.

Action

Divide students into groups and assign each group to one shape of cup. Fill cups with water to different levels.
Students tap the rim of each cup with a pencil. They should hear different pitches; that is, the cups should vibrate at different frequencies.
After they've tapped the rims several times, ask students why they think there is a difference. (More water makes the sides of the cups more stable and the vibration is slower, which results in a lower pitch).
Student groups may hear different pitches for different shaped cups filled to the same level of water. Tall glasses may vibrate faster than short, wide glasses.
Deeper Depths

Test the pitch of the cups above using a less dense liquid such as rubbing alcohol (density of 0.791 grams per cm3) and a more dense liquid of glycerin (1.26 grams per cm3). Is there a difference in the pitch?

Students can also determine what notes each glass produces by comparing sounds with a known musical instrument.

The Art of Science: Ben Franklin's Harmonica


Inspired by musical wine glasses he heard played in Europe, Ben Franklin invented a mechanical glass harmonica in 1761. The instrument fell out of favor in the next century and was not heard again until 1982, when German-born glassblower Gerhard Finkenbeiner brought it back to life. Finkenbeiner heard about the instrument while living and working in Paris in the 1950s. Using original plans and drawings, he reinvented the modern glass harmonica.

Curriculum Links
Related Frontiers Shows and Activities
Introduction: Good Vibrations
Activity 1: See and Touch Sound
Activity 2: The Sounds of Music
Activity 3: Franklin's Inspiration
Extensions



CURRICULUM LINKS


CHEMISTRY

glass
HISTORY

Ben Franklin
MUSIC

PHYSICAL SCIENCE
PHYSICS

acoustics, frequency, sound




RELATED FRONTIERS SHOWS AND ACTIVITIES

Expedition Panama (Show 801): Echoes in the Night
Inventing the Future (Show 701): Brain Music


INTRODUCTION: GOOD VIBRATIONS

Sound is created by vibrations that produce sound waves. The speed of the vibration, or frequency, determines the pitch -- high or low -- heard when the waves strike the ear drum, which translates the sound into a nerve impulse that is processed by the brain. All materials have a natural frequency of vibration. Glass used to make glass instruments starts to "sing" when the vibration gets the molecules moving at their natural frequency. By building and playing homemade instruments, you can see how various materials produce different sounds, and "exp-ear-ience" the good vibrations we call music!



ACTIVITY 1: SEE AND TOUCH SOUND

Some sounds are easily interpreted when they reach your ear. For example, when vocal cords vibrate at a high frequency (fast), a shrill or high-pitched sound will result, which might be an expression of fright. At a low frequency (slow), a low-pitched sound is produced, like a growl, which could be a warning of impending danger. Without a sense of hearing, can you determine what kind of sound is being produced?

OBJECTIVE

Explore the world of sound with hearing and other senses.

MATERIALS
high- and low-pitched tuning forks (use forks of similar sizes)
glass of water
ear plugs
blindfold
PROCEDURE

Students can work in pairs for this activity. One student is the observer or subject, the other student the assistant.
Blindfold subjects and have them listen to high- and low-pitched tuning forks until they can recognize the sound generated by each. Have the assistants strike the forks so subjects use only their ears to "gather data."
Remove the blindfolds and have the subjects put in ear plugs. (They may need to wrap a bandanna around their heads to further block the sound.)

Assistants should strike one of the tuning forks and hold it in a glass of water. Ask if the subjects can identify which frequency tuning fork it is by looking at the water.

Repeat the procedure with the other tuning fork.

Next, replace the blindfolds on the subjects (still wearing earplugs).

Give the subjects one of the tuning forks and tell them to strike it.

Ask subjects to try to identify which frequency tuning fork they are holding, just by how it feels when it vibrates.
Note: If you use tuning forks for different notes, like A and C, you can detect a difference in how the vibrations cause water to move, but it is subtle. It takes practice to see and feel differences in the forks.

QUESTIONS
Is it possible to perceive sound without using your ears?

What evidence did you use to identify low and high frequencies?

How do animals interpret sound vibrations without using a sense of hearing (bats and snakes, for example)?

An easy way to "feel" vibrations is to place your index finger on your neck and start with a growl (low frequency) and increase the sound in your throat to a higher pitch (high frequency). Can you feel the speed of the vibration in your vocal cords with your fingertips?


ACTIVITY 2: THE SOUNDS OF MUSIC

Some of the main instruments in an orchestra or band use "wind" to create a vibration in a reed to make a sound. In this activity, use a straw to make a crude reed-like instrument you can experiment with to produce sounds.

OBJECTIVE

Find out how different length straws influence sound by modifying frequency.

MATERIALS
plastic straws
PROCEDURE
Cut the corners of a straw to form a mouth-piece. (These are rather crude reeds.) Press the two sides of the cut straw together to flatten them.

Place the cut end between your lips and close your lips to bring the two sides close together.

Blow through the straw until the cut end vibrates and produces a sound. You may need to blow very hard and vary the pressure with your lips to produce the sound. If you can't make a sound, flatten the cut end more.

Once you are producing a sound, keep blowing and cut off small bits (1 or 2 cm at a time) of the straw to hear how the sound changes.
QUESTIONS
How does changing the length of the straw affect the sound?

How does the sound produced relate to frequency of the vibrations? (high frequency or pitch = fast vibrations; low = slow vibrations)

Can you use two straws (one slightly larger than the other) to create a trombone-like instrument?


ACTIVITY 3: FRANKLIN'S INSPIRATION

Franklin's instrument, which he called a glass "armonica" after the Italian word for harmonica, is a series of glass cups on a rotating, horizontal spindle. Each cup represents one note of the musical scale. One instrument is composed of two or three octaves. Today's glass harmonica is also made from a series of glass bowls or cups, but Gerhard Finkenbeiner uses only quartz or pure crystal glass. Impurities in the glass affect the vibrations; the purer the material, the more likely the molecules will all vibrate at the same frequency.

Musical experience helps in learning to master this sensitive instrument, but you don't need crystal to produce sound. You do need carefully washed hands, clean water and damp fingers to make music.


OBJECTIVE

Experiment with different glasses, much as Franklin did, to try to produce musical sounds.

MATERIALS
glasses (a variety is good; wine glasses are best)
butter knife, spoon or other metal utensil
pitcher of water
Note: Glass wine glasses are recommended because of their shape and the thin glass. Water goblets will also work. Experiment with various shapes, sizes and kinds of glass. The thinner and purer the glass, the better the sound.

PROCEDURE
Start with one glass and tap it gently with the utensil.

While tapping the glass, pour water into it about 2.5 cm at a time. Listen and have another student record how the sound changes as the water level increases.

Repeat the procedure with different glasses and record the effect the shape or type of glass has on the sound generated.

Repeat Steps 1 through 3. Instead of tapping the glass with the utensil, wet your finger and rub it around the edge of the glass until a sound is produced. (Make sure your finger is clean before you start and keep it wet. It takes practice to produce the eerie sound.)

Try to fill separate glasses so that you are able to play a simple tune with the knife or your finger, like "Mary Had a Little Lamb." If you can tune the glasses to specific notes, mark the notes on the glasses and indicate the water level with a marker. (In the glass harmonica seen on Frontiers, the cups with gold rims indicate sharps and flats.)


EXTENSIONS:

Experiment and see who can master the glasses to play more complex music.

Try to build different instruments (string, wind, percussion) and conduct a "silly symphony" at your next assembly.


http://www.pbs.org/safarchive/4_class/45_pguides/pguide_804/4484_franklin.html

외친다.

모두 다른 목소리로..

그러나

그들은 하나다.

드러나지 않고 밝혀지지 않았던 더 넓을 세계를

외친다.

우리에게

필요한것은

의식의 전환이다.


'먼지를 털어낸다'라고 할까요. 그것은 결국 모노를 모노로 되돌리는 것이죠. 컵을 예로 들면 컵의 개념이라든가 명사성이라는 먼지를 털어내는 겁니다. 그때 모노는 모노가 되죠. 그렇게 함으로써 비로소 보이지 않는 것이ㅣ 보이게 됩니다. 존재자를 존재 그 자체의 방향으로 해명하는 것이죠.' - 세키네 노부오

I want to say that all that seems like fantastic mistakes are not mistakes and all that seems like error is not error; and it all has to be done. That which seems like a false step is just the next step.

You may as well give up judging your actions. If it is the unconditioned life that you want, you do not know what you should do or what you should have done...

Say to yourselves: I am going to work in order see myself and free myself. While working and in the work I must be on the alert to see myself. When I see myself in the work I will know that this is the work I am supposed to do.

(Agnes Martin, Writings)

Emily Dickinson: 341


After great pain, a formal feeling comes—
The Nerves sit ceremonious, like Tombs—
The stiff Heart questions was it He, that bore,
And Yesterday, or Centuries before?

The Feet, mechanical, go round—
Of Ground, or Air, or Ought—
A Wooden way
Regardless grown,
A Quartz contentment, like a stone—

This is the Hour of Lead—
Remembered, if outlived,
As Freezing persons, recollect the Snow—
First—Chill—then Stupor—then the letting go—



I'm halfway through Lucy Lippard's Eva Hesse, a book I've been meaning to read for years and one remarkable in its balance. Both biography and critical analysis, it's illustrated abundantly but in plain-paper black & white (it works); and, while there are many excerpts from Hesse's diaries and letters, the reader feels a level of privacy respected, perhaps because Lippard and Hesse were friends.

Much of what's been written about Eva Hesse has concentrated on the extremes and tragic aspects of her childhood and early death instead of her art. (She died of a brain tumor when she was 34, "at the height of her powers," though who knows how high she might have gone.) I appreciate that Lippard's book tells more about Hesse's growth as an artist and her everyday studio life, the making of drawings and sculptures, and about her struggles pursuing this life/career as a young woman in the 1960s.



some notes:
"There were miles of that string there. The string was what really got her going."
"You could date them by the way the color became less and less important."
"a vocabulary of shapes"
"absolutely straightforward and devoid of modulations"
"I use a word for its sound"
"No more haze"
"Plaster!... Its whiteness is right."
"You belong in the most secret part of you"
"leaving behind shadows"
"I saw her as a very interior person making psychic models."
"if there had been more time"




Eva Hesse
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art February 2- May 19, 2002

It is something, it is nothing:The "non-work" of Eva Hesse
By Marcia Tanner

I would like the work to be non-work. This means that it would find its way beyond my preconceptions...It is the unknown quantity from which and where I want to go. As a thing, an object, it accedes to its non-logical self. It is something, it is nothing.
From Hesse's statement for her 1968 exhibition Eva Hesse: Chain Polymers at the Fischbach Gallery, New York, quoted in Lucy R. Lippard, Eva Hesse (New York; New York University Press, 1976), p. 131


Possibly the best introduction to Eva Hesse is no introduction at all. I first saw her work around fifteen years ago at the Museum of Contemporary Art in L.A in a large group exhibition of American Minimalist artists of the 1960s and '70s. You had your Judds, your Andres, your Irwins, and your Flavins: an impressive display of industrially fabricated, meticulously machined, formally pristine, rigorously systematic, coldly elegant, aggressively untouchable (why bother?), muy macho objets d'art. I turned a corner and suddenly there was something unexpected to look at. Two somethings, actually: a wall piece and a floor piece, both wonderfully eccentric. My first reaction was to gasp, then laugh out loud. A laugh can be a complex response; incredulity, delight, recognition of a kindred spirit, were components of that one.

Hang Up (1966), Eva Hesse

The wall piece (Hang Up, 1966) is a large, empty, rectangular picture frame, laboriously hand-wrapped in painted cloth, from which protrudes a lascivious, tongue-like loop (steel tubing wrapped in cord, then painted), that lolls down to the floor and literally extends itself to you, the viewer, daring you to interact with it. It's awkward, ungainly, almost grotesque, yet compelling - endearing, even. The image it creates is absurd, vulgar, funny, and expressive, like a rebellious line describing a body part which has escaped from the picture plane, declaring independence from Flatland and the frame's imprisoning geometry. It wants to be embodied, sexual, three-dimensional. DON'T FENCE ME IN. Like Hang Up, the floor piece, Repetition Nineteen III, (1968), acknowledged and challenged the premises and tactics of all the other work in that exhibition. It's a seemingly random grouping of eighteen (originally nineteen; one hasn't survived) translucent, columnar vessels made of fiberglass and polyester resin, tall enough to be phallic, open enough to be vaginal. They're similar to each other but each one is individually molded, with its own idiosyncratic tilts, indentations, and imperfections, reflecting the characteristics of the material and the hand of the maker. The aesthetic sense is almost Japanese, although the way these fragile golden vessels hold and transmit light shares affinities with mystical traditions in Western image-making. I had never seen anything like this piece, which then appeared to me extraordinarily beautiful. It still does. The objects themselves, and their improvisational arrangement, describe the ambiguity and contingency of the way things are in this world. The vessels look rigid yet malleable, substantial yet ephemeral, absurd yet dignified, stalwart yet vulnerable, obviously related yet individuated and stubbornly unique. They're abstract yet have the bearing of personages. The piece borrows the notions of seriality and the systematic organization of the grid - fundamental Minimalist principles - only to disrupt them. (Nineteen is a prime number, impossible to grid.) Both works were like externalizations of Minimalism's Jungian shadow: audacious metaphors for the return of the repressed, created with a keen sense of humor and even keener mind, hand, eye, and heart.

Eva Hesse died in 1970 of a brain tumor, aged 34. Her exhibiting career spanned ten years, from 1961-1970. Her production during that brief decade was prodigious - in quantity, in the increasingly radical originality of her practice, and in the accelerating urgency and visionary daring of her artistic evolution. Hang Up and Repetition Nineteen III were included, along with hundreds of other works, in the comprehensive Eva Hesse retrospective co-organized by Elizabeth Sussman and Renate Petzinger for the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. In the thirty years since her death, Hesse has survived her co-option as a feminist martyr (the Sylvia Plath of visual art) to become recognized as one of the most important and profoundly influential artists in the second half of the 20th Century.

Repetition Nineteen III (1968), Eva Hesse

If you missed the show at SFMOMA you're out of luck, unless you can get to the Wiesbaden Museum in Germany, where it opens in June, or to Tate Modern, London, its final venue in 2003. The Whitney Museum in New York cancelled it due to post 9/11 budget constraints. Although this was the second Hesse retrospective in a decade - a 1992 exhibition organized for Yale University Art Gallery traveled to the Hirshhorn Museum in Washington, D.C. - there may never be another on this scale. Thanks to Hesse's commitment to fugitive materials like latex, fiberglass, and polyester resin (she felt art works, like organisms, should be subject to decay, respond to the pull of gravity, and have a finite life span) many of the more fragile works in the show may not survive another trip. Several of her pieces have disintegrated already.

This exhibition traces Hesse's entire artistic journey, from her paintings of the late 1950s (she began, surprisingly enough, as a painter), through her works on paper (watercolors, gouaches, collages, drawings with pen, pencil, and colored inks) and relief paintings, to the sculptures and sculptural installations she made until the year of her death. The reliefs are literally 'reliefs' in that you can tell by looking at them how liberating it was for her to propel those zany hybrid biomorphic/machine forms she'd been drawing right out, in full color, into three-dimensional space. When I saw Eighter from Decatur (1965), a wacky pink, yellow and white whirligig contraption (tempera paint, cord, and metal on Masonite), jump off the wall in a gallery otherwise hung with convoluted if exquisite line drawings, I thought 'You go, girl!"' Top Spot, (1965), is another gem. It uses industrial detritus (enamel paint, metal conduit, cord, plastic pipes, metal hardware and bolt, and wood on particle board painted a pretty aqua perfect for the suburban bathroom) to riff on the Minimalists' use of industrial materials as examples of faulty plumbing and wiring. After this, there was no stopping her.

Accession (1968), Eva Hesse

The last half of the show is devoted to the work for which she is best known: the 'eccentric abstractions'; the gridded and quasi-Minimalist pieces like Accession I, II and III, (1968) (perforated topless cubes whose interiors bristle with loops of vinyl tubing - Donald Judd meets Meret Oppenheim); the late drawings (grids of obscured 'windows' - Hesse's mother killed herself by jumping from a window); and the late sculptures exploring the properties of materials like latex, fiberglass, polyester resin, rope, cloth, vinyl tubing, metal mesh, polyethylene sheeting, and pigment. Hesse was voracious and eclectic in her influences. At various stages in her practice you can see how she absorbed and transmogrified the work of Josef Albers (her teacher at Yale, whom she loathed), de Kooning, Klee, Gorky, Roberto Matta, Kandinsky, Guston, LeWitt, Bourgeois, Bontecou, Judd, Andre, and Jackson Pollock. Her last piece, Untitled, (1970) - a tangled, knotted ceiling hanging of latex over rope and string - is clearly a response to Pollock's drip paintings: let's make it airborne and see how it flies. It's gloriously ugly, probably my favorite piece in the show.

Hesse's influence on subsequent generations of artists is incalculable. But any artist practicing today who values process over product, or combines labor-intensive craft with rigorous conceptual content, or experiments with unorthodox and possibly toxic materials to make things as yet unseen, or goofs on Minimalism and other male-dominated aesthetic tropes, owes her a debt. As do we all.

Eva Hesse was on view at the San Francisco Museum of Modern art February 2- May 19, 2002. It will be at Museum Wiesbaden from June 11-13 October, 2002 and at the Tate Modern in 2003.


Addendum 1967

© Estate of Eva Hesse
Hesse’s work often combines contradictory elements. For instance, the rigid order of geometric forms contrasted with organic shapes that evoke the body. Addendum is based on a strict mathematical progression, so that the gaps between each hemisphere become incrementally larger. However, the hemispheres themselves resemble breasts, and the hanging cords drop to the floor and curl in an unruly tangle. She said, ‘I was always aware that I could combine order and chaos, string and mass, huge and small.’

• abstraction
from recognisable sources---- figure
non-representational---- geometric
irregular forms
• emotions, concepts and ideas
formal qualities ----order
repetition
sequence
universal concepts-- illogicality

Monday, April 24, 2006


생태학적 키보드

Friday, April 21, 2006

Art is exquisitely responsive. Nowhere is feedback so absolute as in the making of art. The work we make, even if unnoticed and undesired by the world, vibrates in perfect harmony to everything we put into it - or withhold from it. In the outside world there may be no reaction to what we do; in out artwork there is nothing but reaction.
The breathtakingly wonderful thing about this reaction is its truthfulness. Look at your work and it tells you how it is when you hold back or when you embrace. When you are lazy, your art is lazy; when you hold back, it holds back; when you hesitate, it stands there staring, hands in its pockets. But hwen you commit, it comes on like blazes. (p.49)

In the ideal- that is to say, real - artist, fears not only continue to exist, they exist side by side with the disires that complement them, perhaps drive them, certainly feed them. Naive passion, which promotes work done in ignorance of obstacles, becomes-with courage-informed passion, which promotes work done in full acceptance of those obstacles.
Formost among those obstacles is uncertainty. We all know the feeling of finished art that rides from within its unceretainies.(p.50)

our most personal histories hold crystalline memories of absorption into evocative work.

If, indeed, for any given time only a certain sort of work resonates with life, then that is the work you need to be doing in that moment. If you try to do some other work, you will miss your moment. Indeed, our own work is so inextricably tied to time and place that we cannot recapture even our own aesthetic ground of past times. Try, if you can, to reoccupy your own aesthetic space of a few years back, or even a few months. There is no way. You can only plunge ahead, even when that carries with it the bittersweet realization that you have already done your very best work.

This heightened self-consciousness was rarely an issue in earlier times when it seemed self-evident that the artist (and everyone else, for that matter) had roots deeply intertwining their culture. Meanings and distinctions embodied within artworks were part of the fabric of everyfday life, and the distance from art issues to all other issues was small. THe whole population counted as audience when artists' work encompassed everything from icons for the Church to untensils for the home.

Today art issues have for the most part become solely the concern of artists, divorced from -and ignored by - the larger community.Today artists often back away from engaging the times and places of their life, choosing instead the largely intellectual challenge of engaging the times and places of art.(p.54)

There's a difference between meaning that is embodied and meaning that is referenced.(p.55)

Nominees for Leading Role in a Continuing Artists' Funk are
(1) you've entirely run out of new ideas forever,
or
(2) you've been following a worthless deadend path the whole time.
And the winner is neither.

One of best kept secrets of artmaking is that new ideas come into play far less frequently than practical ideas-ideas that can be re-used for a thousand cariations, supplying the framework of a whole body of work rather than a single piece.
The promoise of paths not taken is that our work is really more than it appears, that it would shine through better if only things had been a little bit different.(p.56)

When things go haywire, your best opening strategy might be to return-very carefully and consciously- to the habits and practices in play the last time you felt good about your work.Return to the space you drifted away from and the work will return as well.(p.57)

Working within the self-imposed discipline of a particular form eases the prospect of having to reinvent yourself with each new piece. The discovery of useful fomrs is precious. Once found, they should never be abandoned for trivial reasons.

Only the maker (and then only with time) has a chance of knowing how important small conventions and rituals are in the practice of staying at work. The private details of artmaking are utterly uninteresting to audiences, perhaps because they're almost never visible-or even knowable-from examining the finished work.

The hardest part of artmaking is living your life in such a way that your work gets done, over and over- and that means, among other things, finding a host of practices that are just plain useful. A peice of art is the surface expression of a life lived within productive patterns(p.61)

To see far is one thing: going ther is another.
-Brancusi (p.65)

Wednesday, April 19, 2006


Samson," by Chris Burden, turnstile, winch, worm gear, leather strap, timbers, jack, steel and hardware installation, variable dimensions, 1985

Curated by Josh Baer


In this exhibition of early work by Chris Burden, Zwirner & Wirth will present the Deluxe Photo Book 1971- 73, accompanied by six “Relics” from performances staged between 1972 and 1980. The centerpiece of the exhibition is one of Burden’s most important post-performance sculptures, the gallery-destroying apparatus Samson from 1985.

The mythology of Chris Burden is well-known in art world circles. Chris Burden and his work emerged in the early 1970s in Los Angeles amidst a growing movement of “alternative” art forms and groups including earth, body, video, performance and conceptual art. What these groups had in common was an interest in making art that addressed political, social and environmental issues while operating outside of the established museum/gallery nexus. Burden’s early work was unavoidably steeped in Minimalism, however by 1971, with the piece Five Day Locker Piece, it became clear that Burden was forging a new path towards extreme performance.

The Deluxe Photo Book 1971 -1973, is a hand-painted binder that contains all of the photo-documentation and explanatory texts pertaining to the first three years of Burden’s performances. Throughout this period, Burden produced succinct, quasi-scientific descriptions accompanied by photographs from each performance as record of the event. The records of the performances are similar to the events that took place in that they are self-contained, self-explanatory, and reflect the crispness of Burden’s original gesture. The performances were in essence empirical investigations in to the “what ifs” of the world at large. Their purpose was to be accessible, immediate and public and it was critical to Burden that his “pursuit of the facts” be easily comprehensible.

If we think of Burden as a scientist/engineer rather than as a reckless stuntman, the performances demonstrate the depth of Burden’s inquiry into basic human fears such as being shot, stabbed, burned (Dreamy Nights, 1974) or starving to death (B.C. Mexico, 1973). On a more fundamental level the performances operate as commentary on social order and the government’s political and economic control over its people. The relic Back to You,1974, consists of a metal bowl of push pins. During the performance, Burden invited a volunteer to stab the pins into his body in an elevator while spectators watched on a monitor. The work is indeed gruesome, but more importantly, the act of stabbing becomes a physical transgression of established social mores which traditionally dictate that it is unlawful or immoral to self-mutilate. Here, as in many of the early performances, Burden takes back the power over his own body by willfully assigning it to someone else.

The viewer also becomes a witness, as in Dead Man in 1972, where Burden covered himself with a tarp lying in the road flanked by two flares. The flares would eventually burn out increasing the risk of the artist being run over by a car. In Trans-Fixed, 1974, the two nails that were used to crucify the artist to a Volkswagen car are preserved as a relic . The Volkswagen was chosen because it was the car of the “people” and Burden wanted his crucifixion to liberate not just himself but everyone. In experiencing this type of pain and vulnerability firsthand, Burden is able to make it more familiar and, in turn, he demystifies the horror of such acts by making them knowable, both for himself and for the audience. As a result, the collective fears that society uses to keep people in order are exposed and the idea that the human body is governed by law is rendered impotent.

Burden said that his work is the “acting out of an idea, the materialization of the idea”. The performances demonstrate this in their unencumbered actions that vehemently avoid any move towards symbolism. The post-performance works of the 1980s are studies of social power which “concern investigating and testing the origin of power both physical and bureaucratic and how this power ultimately shapes the world we exist in.” Samson, 1985, tests both the physical endurance of the art gallery and, on a conceptual level, the actual institution of housing and displaying art for the public consumption.

The artist describes Samson as simply “a museum installation consisting of a 100 ton jack connected to a gear box and a turnstile. The 100 ton jack pushes two large timbers against the bearing walls of the museum. Each visitor to the exhibition must pass through the turnstile in order to see the exhibition. Each input on the turnstile ever so slightly expands the jack, and ultimately, if enough people visit the exhibition, Samson could theoretically destroy the building. Like a glacier its powerful movement is imperceptible to the naked eye. This sculptural installation subverts the notion of the sanctity of the museum (the shed that houses art).”

In forcing the spectator to pass through the turnstile, Burden assigns them equal culpability in the destruction of the gallery space. The art lover becomes complicit in the destruction of the “temple” that holds the precious objects. This sinister joke, however, is actually embedded in a larger, multi-layered dialogue Burden has been engaged in from the very first performance, namely questioning the necessity of the art object and the role of the artist and the art viewer in contemporary society. The fact that Samson is clearly informed with the minimalist aesthetic that preoccupied Burden’s sculptural work as a student in the late 1960s, is not lost on the historian, nor is the preciousness of the velvet-lined vitrines that encase the relics. As fleeting as the performances were, the objects and documentation Burden gathered, organized and made available to us are thoughtfully preserved.

http://www.zwirnerandwirth.com/exhibitions/2004/0904Burden/press.html


함진

2006.04.20 Thursday

조회(10743)

벤야민과 매체미학, 심혜련 교수와의 인터뷰
독일 평론가 발터 벤야민(1892~1940)의 '아우라' 개념과 복제예술에 대한 이론은 그가 세상을 떠난지 60 여년이 지난 현재의 예술가 및 이론가들에게 가장 중요한 미학이론들 중 하나로 손꼽히고 있다. 그는 예술작품의 원본이 지니는 시간과 공간에서의 유일한 현존성에서 도출되는 '아우라' 를 이야기하면서 이러한 현존성이 결여된 사진이나 영화와 같은 창작품에 대한 새로운 해석을 가져왔다. 즉 독특한 거리감을 지닌 사물에서만 발생하는 아우라는 복제품이나 대량생산된 상품에서는 경험될 수 없다는 것이다.
그러나 오늘날 우리는 단순하게 예술작품을 복제만 한다기 보다는 그것을 변형하여 재생산하기에 이르렀고, 미술계 역시 하루가 다르게 급변하는 혼란한 상황이다. 이러한 때에 우리가 정체성을 찾고 나아갈 방향을 정립하기 위한 한가지 방법은 인문학적 개념정리를 통한 상황의 해석이라고 본다.
현재 홍익대학교에서 매체미학을 강의하고 있는 심혜련 교수를 통해 벤야민 이론에 대해 다시 되짚어보고 그의 견해를 들어보고자 인터뷰를 청하였다.


윤상훈 : 현재 사이버 미디어와 관련된 강의를 하고 계신데, 강의의 주된 내용은 어떤 것입니까?

심혜련 : 주로 미학, 예술과 관련해 매체 미학을 다루고 있습니다. 매체 미학은 기존의 전통적인 미학이론이나 예술론으로는 현대 매체 예술을 분석하기에는 부족하다는 전제에서 출발합니다. 매체 예술은 이전의 전통적인 예술과는 예술 형식도 다르고, 매체, 즉 기술이 차지하는 위상도 다르고, 특히 수용 방식도 많이 다르기 때문에 전통적 예술 이론으로는 현대의 매체 예술을 설명하고 평가하기가 어려우니깐, 지금은 매체 예술을 설명해낼 수 있는 이론적 틀에 대한 탐구가 바로 매체 미학의 주요 과제라고 생각합니다.
특히 미학이 아름다움에 관한 이론이나, 예술에 대한 철학을 의미하는 것이 아니라, 바로 미학의 어원적 근원인 희랍어 “아이스테시스(aisthesis)”의 본래적 의미인 감성, 지각에 관한 이론이어야한다는 것이 매체 미학의 기본 전제라고 할 수 있습니다. 이런 식의 규정에 따르면 미학은 일종의 ‘감성적 지각 이론’, ‘감성학’ 등이 되는 거죠.
이런 기본전제에서 매체 미학의 기본이 되는 사상, 즉 벤야민, 맥루한 등을 다루고, 또 구체적인 매체 미학의 이론들, 즉 볼츠, 바이벨, 벨쉬 등등의 이론들을 예술과 관련해서 다루고 있습니다. 그러나 매체 미학이 아직 진행중인 이론이라서 수업시간에는 그냥 다양한 이론들을 접하고, 학생들과 매체 예술과 매체 미학에 대해 여러 가지 문제를 생각해보고 토론하기도 하지죠.


윤상훈 : 벤야민과 관련된 논문을 많이 발표하셨는데요 현대의 예술이나 미학에 있어서 벤야민의 이론들이 중요한 위치를 차지하는 특별한 이유는 어디에 있습니까?

심혜련 : 벤야민은 현대 예술론과 미학, 그리고 대중 문화론에서 아주 중요한 위치를 차지하고 있다고 생각합니다. 여러 가지 점에서 그러하다고 생각하는데, 몇 가지만 지적해보면, 우선 벤야민은 20세기 초 대중 문화가 본격적으로 모습을 드러낼 때 살았던 사람입니다. 대중 문화의 발전기에서 대중 문화를 철학적 미학적 탐구의 대상으로 삼고 연구를 시도했다는 점을 들 수 있습니다. 그 당시 다른 많은 이론가들은 결코 대중 문화 현상을 학문적 주제로 삼지 않았습니다. 왜냐하면 대중 문화는 그냥 저속하고 통속적이고 오락적인 문화에 불과하다고 생각했으니까요. 물론 대중 문화 현상을 학문적 주제로 삼아 연구한 사람들이 벤야민 외에도 있습니다. 그러나 이런 사람의 대부분은 대중 문화 현상을 부정하고 비판하는 입장에서 논의를 전개한 것이기 때문에 벤야민과는 차이가 있습니다. 이러한 대중 문화에 대한 벤야민의 관심은 바로 일상성에 대한 미학적 추구에서 기인한다고 봅니다. 즉 우리가 대도시 곳곳에서 접할 수 있는 사물과 이미지들에서 철학적 미학적 계기들을 찾은 것이지요. 이런 벤야민의 시도는 일상성의 미학, 또는 대중 예술의 미학이라는 측면에서 보면, 굉장히 앞서간 시도라고 볼 수 있지요.
또 특히 매체 미학과 관련에서 벤야민의 이론은 아직도 유효성을 갖고 있다고 생각합니다. 벤야민이 1920년대와 30년대의 변화를 보고 이 시대를 ‘기술 재생산 시대’라고 규정했습니다. 이 시대에 적합한 예술 형식은 전통적 예술 형식인 회화가 아니라, 사진, 영화 더 나아가 광고 등이라고 보았습니다. 이렇게 주장한 전제 조건은 다음과 같습니다. 즉 벤야민은 예술 작품을 철저히 사회적 산물로 파악합니다. 따라서 사회가, 특히 사회의 기술적 발전 수준이 바뀌면 예술 작품의 형식도 바뀌고, 또 예술 작품의 형식이 바뀌면 그 예술 작품을 수용하는 수용 방식도 바뀐다고 주장했습니다. 이런 벤야민의 기본 전제는 현대 매체 예술을 설명하는데 기본 축이 될 수 있습니다. 즉 벤야민이 살았던 시대가 기술 재생산 시대라면, 지금은 또 다른 시대입니다. 디지털 매체 시대라고 할까요. 그러면 이 시대에는 이 매체의 방식에 상응하는 예술 형식이 새롭게 등장할 것이고, 또 이 새롭게 등장한 예술 작품을 수용하는 방식도 바뀌겠지요.
앞에서 이야기했듯이 매체 미학의 기본 전제는 수용자 측면에서의 예술 작품의 ‘지각’문제인데, 이것을 이미 벤야민이 사진과 영화에 관련된 논의에서 이것을 탐구합니다. 이런 측면에서 벤야민의 논의는 아직도 많은 것들을 줄 수 있는 이론이라고 생각합니다.


윤상훈 : 사진, 광고, 영화등의 변형된 예술의 등장을 벤야민은 '아우라의 몰락'이라고 명명하여 이러한 새로운 형식의 예술은 기술 재생산 시대 이전의 예술작품과는 다른 지각방식을 요구한다고 말했습니다. 벤야민이 말한 '다른 지각방식'이란 어떤것이고 '대중예술은 저급하다'는 일반적인 통념속에서 그렇다면 우리는 어떠한 자세로 그것들을 받아 들여야 할까요.

심혜련 : 요즘 아우라라는 개념은 번역이 필요없는 하나의 새로운 유행적 언어가 된 것 같습니다. 신문과 잡지 등에서 쉽게 아우라라는 단어를 볼 수 있으니까요. 벤야민이 사진, 영화 그리고 광고 등을 미학적 학문의 대상으로 주목하면서 ‘기술 재생산시대의 예술 작품’이라는 개념을 사용했습니다. 그리고 이러한 예술의 특징을 ‘아우라의 몰락’ 또는 ‘아우라의 상실’이라고 규정합니다. 일단 이 논의의 전제는 예술은 사회적 산물이므로, 사회가 변화면 지배적인 예술 형식도 변한다는 것입니다. 따라서 새로운 예술 형식으로서의 사진과 영화를 주목하는 것이지요. 벤야민 시대에 다른 이론가들은 사진과 영화의 수용 방식에 문제를 삼으로 이것은 예술이 아니라라고 주장하는 것과는 달리 벤야민은 새로운 예술 형식은 새로운 지각 방식을 요구한다고 합니다. 즉 전통적 예술 작품, 대표적으로 회화는 몰입, 집중, 관조와 침잠 등을 대표적인 지각 방식으로 요구합니다. 그러나 벤야민에 따르면 사진과 영화는 기본적으로 이러한 전통적 지각 방식과는 다른 지각 방식, 즉 정신오락적 분산적 지각 방식에 더 적합한 것이라고 합니다. 특히 영화는 회화와는 다르게 움직이는 그림입니다. 움직이는 그림은 일차적으로 그림이 고정되어 있지 않기 때문에 수용자의 연상이 고정될 수 없다고 합니다. 즉 화면의 그림의 움직임과 더불어 수용자의 연상 작용도 움직이는 것이지요. 따라서 이 과정에서 분산적 지각 형태가 드러난다고 합니다.
여기서 더 나아가 오락적 성격이 강한 대중 예술을 옹호하는 입장을 취합니다. 벤야민은 예술의 기능 중에서 예술이 가지고 있는 오락적 기능, 즉 즐기는 기능에 주목합니다. 예술은 즐기는 것이고, 따라서 일상성에서 충분히 예술적 대상을 찾아낼 수 있다는 것이지요. 여기서 벤야민은 예술이 예술의 자율성이란 이름으로 사회와 대중과 멀어지는 현상을 우려했던 것입니다. 대중 예술이란 형태로 일단은 일반 대중이 예술에 접할 수 있는 길이 확대된 것을 높이 평가하는 것입니다. 즉 ‘예술작품에 대한 민주적 접근 가능성의 확대’가 벤야민이 대중 문화를 통해 보려고 했던 첫 번째의 긍정적 계기입니다. 이런 관점에서 대중 문화와 대중 예술은 저급하니깐, 학문적 고려의 대상이 아니다라는 주장에 반대하면서, 대중이 즐기는 문화와 예술에 대해 진지하게 접근해보자고 하는 것이지요. 이런 태도는 아직도 유효하다고 생각합니다. 뿐만 아니라 벤야민 이후에 대중 문화론과 대중 문화와 예술의 상관 관계에 대한 논의들이 바로 이런 입장에서 시작한 것이라고 볼 수 있습니다.


윤상훈 : 벤야민이 말한 ‘아우라의 몰락’이후 또 시대는 많이 흘렀습니다. 대중예술을 놓고 볼때 대중예술이라는 테두리 안에서 또 다른 경계가 생겼다고 생각합니다. 예를 들면 영화의 경우 일반 상업영화와 단편예술영화를 분리하듯이 말이죠. 그렇다는 것은 벤야민 이후 또 다른 아우라의 몰락이 시작되었다는 의미 일까요? 그렇다면 벤야민의 이론은 이제 더 이상 우리에겐 적용이 되지 않는건가요?

심혜련 : 그것은 아우라의 개념과는 별개의 문제입니다. 벤야민이 사진과 영화, 더 나아가 광고라는 것을 새로운 예술형식으로 봤던 시대는 기술재생산의 시대였던 거죠. 지금은 디지털 미디어 시대, 정보매체 시대입니다. 벤야민의 이론이 현시대도 유효하다고 말하는 것은 벤야민의 이론이 그대로 정확히 맞는다는 것이 아니라 문제설정 방식과 접근방식이 유효하다는 뜻입니다. 예를 들어 예술은 사회적 산물이다라는 것은 벤야민의 제1전제입니다. 예술은 사회적 산물이기 때문에 사회적 현상관계가 바뀌면 예술 형식도 바뀐다는 의미죠. 전통적인 시대에서는 회화, 조각 등이 대표적인 예술형식이었고 기술재생산 시대에서는 사진,영화등이 대표적 예술형식이었고 그렇다면 사회적 산물로써의 예술이 디지털 매체 시대에는 어떠한 새로운 예술형식으로 등장할 것인가 라는 것이 아직도 유효하다는 것이 기본적인 이론의 틀이 될 수 있습니다.
벤야민의 이론을 그대로 가져와서 지금의 예술형식에서 아우라가 있느냐 없느냐 내지는 지금의 예술형식이 정신오락적 분산적 지각 방식을 요구하느냐 혹은 몰입, 집중, 관조와 침잠을 요구하느냐는 따질수 없는 문제인 것입니다.
벤야민이 관심을 기울였던 부분은 이미지 복제였습니다. 하지만 지금은 이미지 복제가 화두가 아니라 이젠 이미지 변형의 시대로 볼 수 있습니다. 이미지 변형의 시대에서는 수용자의 역할이 커지는 것이죠. 단순한 수용자로서의 적극적 태도만을 갖는 것이 아니라 수용자가 적극적으로 참여를 해야만 작품이 완성되는 시대입니다.
현대에 와서 아우라의 개념은 확실히 달라졌습니다. 벤야민 식으로 풀이를 한다면 대중문화, 대중음악 등에는 아우라가 없어야 하는데 사실 우리가 영화를 보고난뒤나 대중음악 콘서트 장을 찾고나서도 확실히 무언가 느껴지는 아우라라는 것이 존재합니다. 벤야민이 이야기했던 아우라와는 좀 다르게 현재에서 논의되는 아우라는 작품의 존재론적인 측면에서 이야기가 되는 것입니다. 시대에 따라 함께 변천된 아우라의 개념이 요즘에 와서는 카리스마라는 의미와 조금은 통용되는 것이 아닌가 싶습니다.
결론적으로 벤야민의 논의가 유효하기 위해서는 디지털 매체에 걸맞는 새로운 예술형식은 무엇이고 수용방식은 무엇인가를 우선적으로 따져 봐야지만 아우라에 관한 이론의 틀이 따라갈수 있다고 봅니다.


윤상훈 : 벤야민이 굳이 아우라의 ‘몰락’ 이라는 표현을 썼던 것은 기술 재생산 시대를 경험하면서 사진이나 영화로 인해 앞으로 차차 회화나 공예작품등이 영원히 사라져 버릴것이라고 생각했던 것은 아닐까 느껴지네요.

심혜련 : 아닙니다. 사라지는 것이 아니라 예술의 역할과 기능이 변하는 것이지요. 중요한 것은 벤야민이 사진이라는 새로운 예술형식을 접했을때 그는 사진이 예술이냐 아니냐의 문제가 중요한 것이 아니라 사진의 도입으로 인해 기존 예술계에 닥쳐올 변화가 무엇이냐에 주목을 했다는 것입니다. 복제된 형태라도 예술작품을 접하게 되었을때 일반 대중도 예술에 대한 태도가 어떻게 달라질 수 있는가를 주목했던 것입니다. 그때 당시만 해도 일반 서민은 예술작품을 전혀 대할 기회가 없었기 때문이죠.


윤상훈 : 벤야민은 그럼 그때 당시엔 ‘아우라의 몰락’에 대해서만 언급을 한건가요? 아우라의 재생산이라든지 유지에 대해선 전혀 언급을 하지 않았었나요?

심혜련 : 벤야민의 아우라의 몰락에 관한 입장이나 태도에 대해선 사람들에 따라 해석이나 의견이 매우 분분합니다. 어떤이는 벤야민이 아우라의 몰락을 상당히 안타까워 했다고도 말하는데 저는 그렇게까지 보지는 않습니다. 어찌되었건 벤야민이 상업적인 마케팅적 측면에서 만들어진 아우라에 대해 확실하게 명시를 하기 때문에 벤야민 이후에 벤야민을 연구한 이론가 들이나 후배들 같은 경우에는 그때 나타나는 아우라는 벤야민이 말한 아우라가 아니라 인위적으로 만들어진 가상의 아우라라고 말합니다.


윤상훈 : 그렇다면 단지 경제적 이득을 얻기 위한 상업적 가치만을 추구하는 대중예술과 벤야민이 말한 일반 대중들과의 괴리감을 좁혀가기 위한 의미로서의 대중예술은 어떠한 차이가 있는지 궁금하군요.

심혜련 : 벤야민의 이론은 일차적으로는 상업적 가치 추구로서의 대중예술도 포함은 합니다. 일단 벤야민이 가장 중요하게 언급하고자 했던 것이 예술의 자율성이라는 부분이었기 때문이죠. 예술의 자율성이라는 개념 아래에서 예술을 자꾸 포장하고 대중들이 이해하지 못하고 거리가 있는 작품이야 말로 무언가 심오한 뜻을 가지고 있고 훌륭한 작품이라는 것을 거부했기 때문에 대중과 친밀하고 이해하기 쉬운 예술작품과 연관된 논의도 포함하는 것이죠. 기본적으로 벤야민은 예술이 여러 가지 기능을 가지고 있는데 그 가운데 오락적 기능도 매우 중요한 기능일수 있다는 것을 확실히 시사합니다.


윤상훈 : 컴퓨터를 이용한 다양한 매체의 등장으로 정규 미술교육을 받지 않았어도 미적(美的) 감수성만 가지고 있다면 원하는 미술작품을 창조해 낼 수 있게 되었습니다. 그리고 기존에 회화, 조각 등 고전적인 미술교육을 받은 이들은 영상 테크닉을 배우기 위해 애쓰기도 하고요.
그러나 이러한 현상이 때로는 열린 예술, 예술의 자율성이라는 미명 하에 우연적 효과와 찰나적인 재치만이 남발하는 영상, 설치 작품들로 드러나기도 하고, 영상예술은 넘쳐나는데 갈수록 순수회화는 설 땅을 잃고 있습니다. 이러한 현재 미술계에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

심혜련 : 일단 영상 예술과 순수 회화를 딱히 구별해 낼 수 있을까라는 문제인데... 비디오 아트, 즉 비디오 설치나 비디오 회화는 순수 회화의 범주에 집어넣을 수 없는 건가요? 집어넣을 수 없다면 그 이유는 무엇인가요? 그렇다면 빌 비올라의 작품은 회화는 아니지만, ‘순수’가 아니라고 볼 수 있나요?
저는 영상 예술과 순수 회화라는 구분은 불필요하다고 생각합니다. 오히려 영상 예술과 평면 예술이라고 구분하는 것이 좋지 않을까라고 생각합니다. 일단 ‘순수’라는 말이 가진 폐쇄전인 느낌을 싫어하기 때문이지요. 그리고 말 그대로 ‘순수 회화’로 계속 작업을 하다보면, 저는 작가가 아니라서 잘 모르겠지만, 그래도 추측해보면, 표현의 한계를 느끼고, 자꾸 더 잘 표현할 수 있기를 원하지 않을까요? 즉 표현 영역의 확장을 시도하면은 자연스럽게 새로운 기술적 매체로 눈을 돌리게 될 것 같습니다. 자연스럽게 표현 도구를 바꾸게 되겠지요. 그러나 지적하신 문제들은 저도 충분히 있다고 봅니다. 찰나적인 재치만이 있고 진중함과 깊이가 없는 영상 작업들의 난발을 우려할 수 있다고 봅니다. 아니, 우려해야지요. 기술적 숙련과 재치만을 앞세운 작품들에서 우리는 흔히 예술적 깊이와 감동의 부재를 봅니다.
그러나 이 문제도 대답하기에 쉬운 문제는 아닌 것 같습니다. 결국 이 문제에 대해 들어가 보면, 예술이 무엇이냐하는 아주 기본적인 개념 정의 문제로 들어갈 수밖에 없으니까요. 예술에 깊이와 감동 또 진지함과 비판 정신 등을 기대하지 않아도 된다고 보면, 이 문제는 쉽게 해결되는데... 결국은 예술의 종말에 대한 담론으로 들어갈 수밖에 없다고 생각되는데요. 어쨋든 개인적으로 저는 매체 예술이 예술이기 위해서는 예술적 깊이와 감동이 있어야된다고 생각합니다. 매체가 가지는 형식, 또 기술적 측면과 컨셉트적인 면으로 예술 작품이 구성된다고 생각하지는 않습니다. 이것이 비록 고루한 예술관이라 할지라도 저는 아직은 그렇습니다.


윤상훈 : 그렇군요. 예술을 이것 저것으로 구분한다는 것 자체가 어쩌면 무의미할 수도 있는 문제겠네요. 혹시 전시기획과 관련된 일을 하실 계획은 없으신가요? 사이버 미디어나 영상매체에 관련된 전시를 인문학적 내용을 기반으로 기획하신다면 대중들에겐 아주 흥미로운 전시가 되지 않을까 싶은데요.

심혜련 : 안그래도 사실 이번해에 전시를 하는 몇몇 작가들이 평문을 써달라는 부탁을 받긴 했지만 아직까지는 이론적인 작업을 하고 싶어요. 제가 볼때는 미술이라는 굴레 안에서 인문학적 논의를 충분히 끌어나갈 수 있다고 봅니다. 많은 사람들이 언급은 많이 하지만 깊이가 느껴지지 않았습니다. 그래서 저는 현대의 미술비평에서 많이 언급되는 사상가들에 대한 사상적인 측면들을 한번 훑어보고 정리하고 싶어요. 하이데거, 메를로 퐁티, 니체 등등의 사상을 미술이라는 매게와 연결해서 공부하는 작업이 재미있을 것 같습니다. 더군다나 전 실무를 잘하는 사람이 아니기 때문에 자신이 없어요. (웃음)


윤상훈 : 마지막으로 선생님께서 추구하시는 학자로서의 최고의 가치는 무엇이라고 생각하십니까?

심혜련 : 아직 전 제자신을 학자라고 까지는 생각하지 않습니다.(웃음) 그저 연구하고 공부하는 사람이라고만 생각합니다. 아직까지는 부족한 부분이 많기 때문에 언젠가는 나만의 예술이론을 갖출수 있는 존재가 되고 싶은 거죠. “누구누구의 이론에 의하면” 이 아니라 “나의 예술이론에 따르면”이라고 당당히 이야기 할 수 있는 존재가 되고싶습니다. 지금의 몇배가 넘는 노력을 해야겠죠. (웃음)


윤상훈 : 선생님과의 인터뷰를 통해 벤야민과 그의 이론들에 대해 한걸음 접근할 수 있는 소중한 시간이었습니다. 바쁘신데 시간내주셔서 감사합니다.

심혜련 : 감사합니다.



약 력
1988 이화여자대학교 철학과 졸업
1992 숭실대학교 대학원 철학과 졸업
1993 베를린 자유대학 철학과 입학
2000 베를린 훔볼트대학 미학과 박사과정 졸업
현재 홍익대학교 예술학과 겸임교수

이미지 설명 (위에서 부터)
발터 벤야민 사진
심혜련 교수 사진
신디셔먼 / 무제 (마릴린 먼로)
파리 퐁피두 센터 전경 (롤랑 바르뜨展)
빌 비올라 / The Silent Sea / 2002
백남준 / 다다익선 / 국립현대미술관


인터뷰 / 정리 : 윤상훈 (오픈아트 큐레이터)



Tim Hawkinson


Soundings

Gary Hill

1979, 18:03 min, color, sound


In Soundings, conceived by Hill as a work for broadcast, the found object of a loud speaker becomes the source for a sequence of image/sound/text constructs. A series of what Hill terms "processual rituals" ends with a text "from" the speaker, in which it describes its electronic, changing state as a relationship with the viewer. As Hill speaks about touch and sound in an extrapolated monologue, he buries the speaker in sand, drives a spike through it, sets it on fire and pours waters onto it.

Produced by the TV Lab at WNET/Thirteen, New York.


Shiro Hayami

( b 1927 )"Land Art"

painted stones on a beach


Joseph Beuys, Capri Battery, 1985.
Photography: Jay Beebe and Katya Kallsen, Digital Imaging and Photography Department, Harvard University Art Museums.


JANINE ANTONI
(American, born Bahamas, 1964)
Umbilical, 2001
Edition 14/35.
Silver
3 x 8 x 3" (7.6 x 20.3 x 7.6 cm.)
Sarah Norton Goodyear Fund, 2003

http://www.sculpture.org/documents/scmag01/janfeb01/wanas/wanas.shtml


Slumber
(performance detail), 1994

Loom, yarn, bed, nightgown,
EEG machine, and
artist's REM reading;
dimensions variable

Collection of Dakis Joannou

Photograph by Javier Campano


Janine Antoni was born in the Bahamas in 1964, and lives and works in New York. She received a BA at Sarah Lawrence College, New York, in 1986 and an MFA in sculpture at Rhode Island School of Design in 1989. Since 1991 she has exhibited in solo and group exhibitions in Europe and the USA.
Her first major one-person exhibition was held at the CCA Glasgow and the Irish Museum of Modern Art in Dublin in 1995. Antoni was also the subject of a recent one-person exhibition at the High Museum of Art in Atlanta.

She received the 1996 IMMA/Glen Dimplex Award at the Irish Museum of Modern Art.


De Amerikaanse kunstenaar Janine Antoni maakte met twee stalen haspels een enorm spinnewiel, dat garen spint uit een berg van tweeduizend kilo hennep - van de onschuldige soort - wanneer Antoni er als een koorddanseres overheen loopt. Artnet's Jerry Saltz was bij de première en zag er hoe Antoni haar circusact opvoerde:

"Before her opening, Antoni appeared atop one of the spools as the invitation-only crowd fell into rapt silence. Calmly extending both arms, she began walking this tightrope. Initially, she was wobbly. I thought she'd fall immediately. Soon she gathered herself and shakily then steadily edged on. At the middle of the rope, she intentionally stopped as if to say, This far and no further. Then she inched backward. After some rickety jitters, and after overcoming the whines and cries of babies, a cell phone rang in the crowd, Antoni fluttered back and forth, jerked to the left, tried to regain her balance, couldn't, then gave in."

> The Artist Who Fell to Earth - Jerry Saltz voor Artnet over Janine Antoni en haar installatie To Draw a Line, die deze maand te zien is in galerie Luhring Augustine in New York.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

After all, wanting to be understood is a basic need- an affirmation of th e humanity you share with everyone around you. The risk is fearsome: in making your real work you hand the audience th e power to deny th eunderstanding you seek; you hand them the power to say," you're not like us,you're crazy." (p.39)

The difference between acceptance and approval is subtle, but distinct. Acceptance means having your work counted as the real thing; approval means having people like it. (p.45)
Both acceptance and approval are, quite plainly, audience - related issues.(p.46)

"you could not step twice into the same river; for other waters are ever flowing on to you."
-Heraclitus(ca. 540-480 BC) (p. 49)

Art and Fear

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Sal Randolph

Salrandolph.com/talks/risd.html

Imaginary economics (book): art + commercial + valuation of culture

Objects in a gallery – stereotypical audience’s behavior
What they are feeling about art?
Our society focus on the money = capitalism and commercialism

Marcel Mauss-gift economics(book)

The relationship between free book and audience

Just collect words as her habitual behavior
The minimal composition allows audience to star reading or stop reading at any point
: Free reading space (echo from minimal artist)
Leave your work at the constitutional space

Blog and Internet communications -> the power of Internet social

She uses the social network created by Internet as her new social network (artwork) intentionally => free biennial.

Public space is decided by users (individual purpose)

Opsound.org
Open sound interchange
Against to the copy right invention and economic
Internet radio broadcast

Listen now
Combination between Physical space and Virtual Internet space

Where you are
Tagging system
To do something together
Pod-cast, data experience
Sharing media
Tag on your documentation -> makes another economic system?

The inter actor
Personal interaction _ interactivity
User: search (human) = Browser = server: finder: give the answer (human)
Performance, slower than google, gives the answer as their own opinion

Social architectures: business, team, family, government, and demonstration
History/ sociology/ economics/ political philosophy/ cultural anthropology/ psychology
Use (social architecture) VS contemplation (social sculpture)
Social architectures are made of expectations

Habits/rules/rewards (promises)
Attract people + want to participate

Money/reputation/social connection/pleasure (play and entertainment)

Quote from Christopher Alexander (novelist)

Social architecture as art form-functional, participatory, dynamic form, unmediated,
Generative structure
What is Internet art? History: communicational model
From mouth to ear
Media= something in the middle
Language is the first Mass Medium (McLuhan)
Old media: painting, sculpture (representative)
⇒ photo/ film/ video
⇒ digital media : screen based

Language is conversation: 쌍방향
Writing
Corresponding (letter): correspondence
Publishing = making public
One to many (current notion about communication): book
Community of writers and readers : many to many = every body is participant (past notion)

Text and communication- e-mail, listservers, bulletin boards,
Internet is based on the text
Social software: early game form is based on the text (던전 앤 드레곤)
Blogs / rss, friendster/ myspace, wikipedia, del.ico.us, flicker, last.fm, google
Publishing meets correspondence
Immersive worlds (on-line game): another form of browser
Moving through information world
⇒ immersive operating systems: ex) second life (game which imports the economic system of real life)
#Goal of Sal Randolph
dissolution of the distinction between artist/ producer/ audience
open systems: possibility and chance
making from static to dynamic concept of form
Transparent-non-hierarchy
Simple-technological aspect
Personal-idiosyncratic
Ephemeral-let it just happen and it done
Beauty of situation-Guy Debord




RI Train station

Saturday, April 15, 2006

passeur: man of passage: a person who moves people or things across bordeers or into forbidden zones.
in other words, a ferryman.
crossing the borders, for example, 'opening doors' for other people.
the person could be defined as a person of power who uses that power in the service of others.
Passeur could be artists.

Friday, April 14, 2006

I want to evaporate..

Just like the water in the mid-summer.



Tunning computer

Thursday, April 13, 2006

http://www.lcc.gatech.edu/~mateas/publications/MateasOTH2005.pdf
procedural literacy


What a Old days..

Wednesday, April 12, 2006






wind charm




:)

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/annual/stories/97/xtra.short.perry.html

http://www.iit.edu/~smile/ph9103.html

http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/shockwave/jar.html

http://florida.earth911.org/local/Florida/RecycleGuys/pdf/Glass.pdf

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:bicxl87UDTUJ:www.pbs.org/safarchive/4_class/45_pguides/pguide_804/4484_franklin.html+different+sound+of+glass&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6&client=safari

different sound of glass


gear


spur gear


gear


gear


stolen memory


detail of making the system hitting glass


sound machine.